Feedback
Changelog

Have something to say?

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you.

Link Subtasks to High-Level Goals with Progress Tracking

Users would benefit from the ability to link subtasks (or tasks) to higher-level goals and visualize progress toward those goals based on completion. Currently, there is no clear way to connect day-to-day execution with broader objectives, which makes it harder to track meaningful progress. Enabling this linkage, along with a progress indicator (e.g., percentage or completion bar), would help users stay aligned with their priorities, increase motivation, and provide better visibility into how individual tasks contribute to long-term outcomes.

Renée Johansson 2 days ago

3

Project-Specific Mobile Widget Filters

Users would benefit from the ability to create mobile widgets that display tasks filtered by a specific project (e.g., “Errands”). Currently, widgets lack granular filtering, limiting their usefulness for quick, context-based task access on mobile. Enabling users to select a project when configuring a widget would allow them to surface only relevant tasks, improving focus, usability, and speed when managing day-to-day activities directly from their home screen.

Renée Johansson 2 days ago

4

Customizable Notetaker Name & Background Display

Users currently cannot customize the (Meeting Assistant) notetaker’s name or background display in Aki Assistant during calls, which can feel impersonal and misaligned, especially in client-facing meetings where branding and professionalism matter. This limitation may create confusion for participants and reduce trust in the tool. Enabling simple customization options (such as editing the notetaker name, choosing a preset theme, or adding a custom avatar/logo) would improve user experience, increase adoption in external calls, and better support teams who want the assistant to match their brand and workflow.

Jim 2 days ago

1

Dynamic Deep Focus Block

would like the ability to set a target amount of deep work time (e.g., 4 hours per day) without assigning it to a fixed schedule. The system should dynamically preserve this focus time by allowing meetings/bookings only if the remaining calendar still supports the defined deep work duration, similarly to adaptive scheduling tools, ensuring protected focus time while maintaining flexibility for meetings.

Isabella Sommer 2 days ago

3

Aki Planned Time vs Clickup Estimated Time

On ClickUp, I put time estimates on the top-level tasks based on what was quoted to clients. When ClickUp syncs my tasks to Aki, Aki sets the estimated time as the planned time. Which makes sense, objectively, but I don’t often work on the tasks in one sitting because there will be a long list of subtasks. When I plan a task in the calendar, I may only be planning it for 2 hours that day, instead of the total 6 estimated hours, for example. I would be fine to sort this out manually by duplicating the task or something, but the problem is that it then changes the estimated time on ClickUp to the 2 hours planned. If we could choose to sync the Aki planned time to the ClickUp time tracked instead, that would be great! Or just turn off the time syncing all together, and handle it manually. Or, if Aki pulled in the subtasks, not just the top level task from ClickUp, then I could put more realistic/accurate time estimates on the subtasks, and the planned time would line up more reasonably.

Relly 3 days ago

2

more availability sections needed

I would really like to be able to allow people to select length of meeting! for example they could have a dropdown to choose between 15min, 30min, 1h. and then different slots would be shown to them. this is the number one feature I miss coming over from Motion! their scheduling links were superior in that sense. I’d also like to be able to customise the page for the links but that’s totally secondary.

Helena Väinmaa 5 days ago

1

Add “Time Horizon” grouping to Project List views (This Week / Next Week / This Month / Next Month / Someday)

Akiflow already uses a time-horizon grouping system (This Week / Next Week / This Month / Next Month / Someday) across its main task views. I’d like this same grouping available as an option in Project List views. Current behaviour: Project tasks display as a flat list. The only way to add structure is manually creating sections and dragging tasks in, which goes stale as dates change. Requested behaviour: A “Group by: Time Horizon” toggle in Project List views that automatically buckets tasks using the same logic already applied elsewhere in the app. This would make project views as planning-friendly as the main planner - using logic that’s already built into the product.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Elias 10 days ago

2

Better Goals handling in Weekly Reviews

When planning next week, I find myself frustrated with the Goal section. I usually rarely have new goals. I have tasks in the backlog that I want to turn into goals for next week. So I would like to be able to choose within the existing list of tasks which ones should become goals. I would also like to add to daily rituals a review of the week’s goals to make I am not losing time on “noise” and keep in mind the big picture. Maybe I can add this with custom workflows.

Julie Baillon 11 days ago

1

More space for the Aki Bot

I’m finding myself using th e Akibot more and more, almost not using the clikc button interface anymore (quite new for me as I used to like having control over the taks views, managing my day…). Now I am using Aki bot as a personal assistant asking it to plan my day or week, book slots, jot donw tasks and plan them accordingly, etc. That is why having a small side panel is a bot frusting. Notion has a full size page dedicated to Notion AI. I like it better. Generally speaking, embedding AI a bit everywhere in every feature would be useful, instead of just a bot on the side (and auto tagging projects, which is already a great start)

Julie Baillon 11 days ago

1