@Ryan Meinzer Thanks for the feedback, we really appreciate you sharing this!
We use Calendly for our support team specifically because of their Round Robin feature, which automatically distributes incoming meeting requests across our support agents. This is a team-scheduling capability that falls outside of Akiflow’s scope as a personal productivity app, so it’s not something we currently offer.
That said, our Share Availability feature is something we use ourselves every single day internally, and it’s also actively used by thousands of our users. We’re proud of it and continue to invest in making it better.
If you have specific suggestions on how we can improve the scheduling experience within Akiflow’s personal productivity focus, we’d love to hear them!
Ryan
•
May 18
Good enough to charge customers for, not good enough to use internally.
Noted.
Nunzio
Team•
May 20
Hi Ryan, I want to address it properly because there's a real conceptual mismatch in the premise, and it's worth unpacking
We do use Akiflow ourselves. Every team member at Akiflow uses Akiflow's Share Availability feature for their personal scheduling: individual booking links, recurrent slots, buffer rules, minimum notice, max events per day, conflict checks against connected calendars. That's how we book our 1:1s, our sales discovery calls when they're assigned to a specific person, our partnership meetings, etc. The product runs our own scheduling.
The Calendly link you saw is for round-robin, which is a different problem. Calendly's round-robin is a team event type: one link that automatically distributes incoming meetings across multiple hosts based on availability and distribution rules (priority weighting, equal distribution with a three-meeting fairness threshold, fallback to random when ties occur). When a prospect books through a round-robin link, they don't choose who they meet. The system routes them to whichever teammate is next in the rotation and free at that time. It's a lead-routing layer on top of scheduling, designed for inbound flows where the meeting can be handled by anyone on the team and the goal is to balance workload and response time.
Why this distinction matters: Share Availability and round-robin are not the same feature at different sizes. They're answering different questions.
Share Availability answers: "Here are the times I am free. Pick one and book with me." It's bound to a single host. By design, there is no routing logic, because there is no one to route to.
Round-robin answers: "Here are times someone on our team is free, and the system will pick who." It requires a pool of hosts, a distribution algorithm, fairness counters, and a way to balance loads across the team. It's a different product surface.
So when our inbound flow needs a meeting routed across multiple teammates (typically incoming sales or partnerships where any of several people could take the call), we use a round-robin link. Akiflow doesn't ship round-robin today, so for that specific job we use the tool that does it (Calendly). For everything single-host, we use Akiflow.
There's no inconsistency here. We're using our own product for the job it's built to solve, and using a different tool for a job our product doesn't yet cover. Those two facts are compatible.
Ryan
•
May 20
I genuinely agreed with the round-robin breakdown. Single-host on Akiflow, team routing on Calendly, clean line. Your exact words:
"For everything single-host, we use Akiflow."
Then I went back to my inbox. This is from Peache, Akiflow Support, on March 23, 2026 at 05:17 CDT, setting up our 1:1:
A one-on-one. "With me directly." On Calendly. Two months ago, not two years ago, so "she hasn't migrated her link yet" doesn't cover it. The event slug literally reads meet-your-productivity-coach. And Peache isn't someone I went digging for; she's the name on your support replies across the site.
So "everything single-host runs on Akiflow" isn't the rule.
In practice, the rule is that even your own productivity coach books her single-host calls on a competitor.
Nunzio
Team•
May 20
Our customer-facing coaching and support calls (Peache and the rest of the CS team) sit on top of a Calendly-integrated stack that handles attendance tracking, transcript capture, and routing into our CS tooling. Migrating just the booking link to Akiflow would split that workflow across two platforms and break the integrations we rely on for customer call ops. Again, this is not a single person use case, it’s a CS ops that has to be integrated into the whole stack.
Ryan
•
May 20
The original line was "for everything single-host, we use Akiflow."
Now it's "this is a CS ops that has to be integrated into the whole stack." That's a new category invented after the counterexample landed, not a defense of the original claim. The claim was that single-host runs on Akiflow. A single-host coaching call running on Calendly says otherwise, and "Peache and the rest of the CS team" widens that from one person to a department, your words.
But set the goalpost aside, because your explanation is the actual headline. You're saying the booking link can't move to Akiflow because Calendly integrates with your attendance tracking, transcripts, and CS tooling, and Akiflow would split the workflow and break those integrations.
That is the case for an API, made in your own paragraph. The only reason the integrated stack lives on Calendly and not Akiflow is that Calendly can be integrated and Akiflow can't. That's not a different problem from the one I raised. It's the same problem with the receipts attached. (for the last 5+ years)
You just argued my point for me. Appreciate it.
Ryan
•
May 17
Aki has a scheduling app. We can post a link to our calendar, and people can find openings and schedule them on my calendar.
Tons of things out there do this. Cal.com, calendly, hubspot, etc.
Aki has the feature. But when you schedule with Aki support, they use Calendly. If your tool is not good enough for you to use, why do you expect us to pay for it?
Log in to comment and vote
Comments8
Santiago Romero
May 18
@Ryan Meinzer Thanks for the feedback, we really appreciate you sharing this!
We use Calendly for our support team specifically because of their Round Robin feature, which automatically distributes incoming meeting requests across our support agents. This is a team-scheduling capability that falls outside of Akiflow’s scope as a personal productivity app, so it’s not something we currently offer.
That said, our Share Availability feature is something we use ourselves every single day internally, and it’s also actively used by thousands of our users. We’re proud of it and continue to invest in making it better.
If you have specific suggestions on how we can improve the scheduling experience within Akiflow’s personal productivity focus, we’d love to hear them!
Ryan
May 18
Good enough to charge customers for, not good enough to use internally.
Noted.
Nunzio
May 20
Hi Ryan, I want to address it properly because there's a real conceptual mismatch in the premise, and it's worth unpacking
We do use Akiflow ourselves. Every team member at Akiflow uses Akiflow's Share Availability feature for their personal scheduling: individual booking links, recurrent slots, buffer rules, minimum notice, max events per day, conflict checks against connected calendars. That's how we book our 1:1s, our sales discovery calls when they're assigned to a specific person, our partnership meetings, etc. The product runs our own scheduling.
The Calendly link you saw is for round-robin, which is a different problem. Calendly's round-robin is a team event type: one link that automatically distributes incoming meetings across multiple hosts based on availability and distribution rules (priority weighting, equal distribution with a three-meeting fairness threshold, fallback to random when ties occur). When a prospect books through a round-robin link, they don't choose who they meet. The system routes them to whichever teammate is next in the rotation and free at that time. It's a lead-routing layer on top of scheduling, designed for inbound flows where the meeting can be handled by anyone on the team and the goal is to balance workload and response time.
Why this distinction matters: Share Availability and round-robin are not the same feature at different sizes. They're answering different questions.
Share Availability answers: "Here are the times I am free. Pick one and book with me." It's bound to a single host. By design, there is no routing logic, because there is no one to route to.
Round-robin answers: "Here are times someone on our team is free, and the system will pick who." It requires a pool of hosts, a distribution algorithm, fairness counters, and a way to balance loads across the team. It's a different product surface.
So when our inbound flow needs a meeting routed across multiple teammates (typically incoming sales or partnerships where any of several people could take the call), we use a round-robin link. Akiflow doesn't ship round-robin today, so for that specific job we use the tool that does it (Calendly). For everything single-host, we use Akiflow.
There's no inconsistency here. We're using our own product for the job it's built to solve, and using a different tool for a job our product doesn't yet cover. Those two facts are compatible.
Ryan
May 20
I genuinely agreed with the round-robin breakdown. Single-host on Akiflow, team routing on Calendly, clean line. Your exact words:
"For everything single-host, we use Akiflow."
Then I went back to my inbox. This is from Peache, Akiflow Support, on March 23, 2026 at 05:17 CDT, setting up our 1:1:
"feel free to book a call with me directly using my scheduling link below" https://calendly.com/{peache’s-personal-link}/meet-your-productivity-coach-peache
A one-on-one. "With me directly." On Calendly. Two months ago, not two years ago, so "she hasn't migrated her link yet" doesn't cover it. The event slug literally reads meet-your-productivity-coach. And Peache isn't someone I went digging for; she's the name on your support replies across the site.
So "everything single-host runs on Akiflow" isn't the rule.
In practice, the rule is that even your own productivity coach books her single-host calls on a competitor.
Nunzio
May 20
Our customer-facing coaching and support calls (Peache and the rest of the CS team) sit on top of a Calendly-integrated stack that handles attendance tracking, transcript capture, and routing into our CS tooling. Migrating just the booking link to Akiflow would split that workflow across two platforms and break the integrations we rely on for customer call ops. Again, this is not a single person use case, it’s a CS ops that has to be integrated into the whole stack.
Ryan
May 20
The original line was "for everything single-host, we use Akiflow."
Now it's "this is a CS ops that has to be integrated into the whole stack." That's a new category invented after the counterexample landed, not a defense of the original claim. The claim was that single-host runs on Akiflow. A single-host coaching call running on Calendly says otherwise, and "Peache and the rest of the CS team" widens that from one person to a department, your words.
But set the goalpost aside, because your explanation is the actual headline. You're saying the booking link can't move to Akiflow because Calendly integrates with your attendance tracking, transcripts, and CS tooling, and Akiflow would split the workflow and break those integrations.
That is the case for an API, made in your own paragraph. The only reason the integrated stack lives on Calendly and not Akiflow is that Calendly can be integrated and Akiflow can't. That's not a different problem from the one I raised. It's the same problem with the receipts attached. (for the last 5+ years)
You just argued my point for me. Appreciate it.
Ryan
May 17
Aki has a scheduling app. We can post a link to our calendar, and people can find openings and schedule them on my calendar.
Tons of things out there do this. Cal.com, calendly, hubspot, etc.
Aki has the feature. But when you schedule with Aki support, they use Calendly. If your tool is not good enough for you to use, why do you expect us to pay for it?
eat your own dog food.
Nunzio
May 17
What do you mean?